Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey

Nørskov, Sladjana and Damholdt, Malene F. and Ulhøi, John P. and Jensen, Morten B. and Ess, Charles and Seibt, Johanna (2020) Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7. ISSN 2296-9144

[thumbnail of pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/frobt-07-586263/frobt-07-586263.pdf] Text
pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/frobt-07-586263/frobt-07-586263.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB)

Abstract

It is well-established in the literature that biases (e. g., related to body size, ethnicity, race etc.) can occur during the employment interview and that applicants' fairness perceptions related to selection procedures can influence attitudes, intentions, and behaviors toward the recruiting organization. This study explores how social robotics may affect this situation. Using an online, video vignette-based experimental survey (n = 235), the study examines applicant fairness perceptions of two types of job interviews: a face-to-face and a robot-mediated interview. To reduce the risk of socially desirable responses, desensitize the topic, and detect any inconsistencies in the respondents' reactions to vignette scenarios, the study employs a first-person and a third-person perspective. In the robot-mediated interview, two teleoperated robots are used as fair proxies for the applicant and the interviewer, thus providing symmetrical visual anonymity unlike prior research that relied on asymmetrical anonymity, in which only one party was anonymized. This design is intended to eliminate visual cues that typically cause implicit biases and discrimination of applicants, but also to prevent biasing the interviewer's assessment through impression management tactics typically used by applicants. We hypothesize that fairness perception (i.e., procedural fairness and interactional fairness) and behavioral intentions (i.e., intentions of job acceptance, reapplication intentions, and recommendation intentions) will be higher in a robot-mediated job interview than in a face-to-face job interview, and that this effect will be stronger for introvert applicants. The study shows, contrary to our expectations, that the face-to-face interview is perceived as fairer, and that the applicant's personality (introvert vs. extravert) does not affect this perception. We discuss this finding and its implications, and address avenues for future research.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: South Asian Archive > Mathematical Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@southasianarchive.com
Date Deposited: 05 Jul 2023 04:29
Last Modified: 18 May 2024 08:45
URI: http://article.journalrepositoryarticle.com/id/eprint/1277

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item